England v West Indies: 1st Test - Lord's, Broads and IPL Flaws

England can smile again after taking their first home victory of the summer against the West Indies at Lord's.  Batting the side home, Cook and Bell provided England with the partnership required to chaise down 191 runs on day five, but not before the Windies demanded Jonny Bairstow's presence at the crease with England on 189 after Alistair Cook opened the bat looking for glory, but instead finding the hands of Kirk Edwards.  Despite the score sheet now reading 1-0 to England, the West Indies can take away a wealth of positives from their performance at Lord's.  Shiv Chanderpaul showed off his class, forcing the game to extend to five days, and should have been rewarded with his name on the Lord's honors board.  His trademark anti-reflective strips, worn on his cheek bones, appeared like facial war-paint, as he ground England's bowling attack to a halt.  "The war will be over by Christmas" they cried in 1914, that phrase coming to mind late on day three when Surrey announced their free entry policy for Lord's ticket holders the following day.  Isn't hindsight a wonderful thing?  

The West Indies would have felt they could have done better than their 243-all out in the first innings, allowing England to take early domination of the game.  The atmosphere in the ground on day one was electric as the crowd rose from their seats to congratulate Broad's five-fore.  What a bowler Broad is, nearly left out of the side this time last year, he has well and truly silenced all critics.  Now his name is eternalised on all three honors boards, a test match 100, 5-wicket haul and a 10-wicket haul.  Broady is England's all rounder, no question.  England's first innings finally put an end to the run drought which has plagued the side over the winter.  Strauss smashed 100, whilst Ian Bell batted back into form with 61 off 105 balls.  Through the innings raised yet another question about Strauss' batting, he is still unable to convert an overnight 100 into a double hundred, the runs have silenced his critics...at least for now.  

This test match also threw up questions to cricket's future and its morals.  Where were key West Indian's like Chris Gayle?  Knocking hundreds for IPL teams rather than representing their country at the home of the cricket.  Why do we now live in a generation where domestic league cricket becomes bigger than representing your country at a test match? Everyone knows that, if they too were in Gayle's position they would take the money and the IPL season, but players should not be put into a situation where they have too choose money over playing international cricket.  The ICC should not be allowing the IPL to get bigger than playing test cricket with the national team.  The IPL teams are engineered each year, dictated to by dollar signs, and should not make players compromise their international duties.  These types of competitions are doing nothing for the future of test cricket or the development of young players and their dominance and importance should be culled and controlled by the ICC, before a situation like the English Premier League develops, where individual clubs are bigger than the national team.  I sincerely hope that the ECB take a different approach to improving domestic cricket and don't follow the advertising, money monster that is the Indian Premier League.    

Stuart Broad who took an 11-wicket haul in the match

Shiv Chanderpaul, number one batsman in the world with his trademark anti-reflective strips 

PAKISTAN v ENGLAND: 1st Test, Day 3 - Where it all went wrong for 'the Andrew's' England

“We won’t be panicking” explained Andrew Strauss; “we’ll come back strong in the second Test match” was the message from the captain after England suffered their first test defeat since Perth back in December 2010.  For the first time in over a year we were watching an under-prepared England side, which had under estimated Pakistan’s ability in the sub-continent.  The third day did give England reason to “panic”, at least a little.  The batting order collapsed again, unable to master the line and length of Umar Gul and of course Ajmal struck to take a total of 10 wickets in the entire game. 

The morning began with England needing 3 wickets for as few runs as possible, an easy task for the world number one test side.  England did their best to keep Pakistan from making a large score, but their lower order, namely Akmal, found boundaries with effective use of reverse sweep.  Graham Swann finished off the lower order, with a little help from Broad, but it was clear to see that Pakistan had done enough to secure victory.  Bowled out for 338 runs, they led by 146 – far too many runs for an out-of-form batting line up to make up.  To make England’s life even tougher, Gul removed Andrew Strauss just before lunch.  England trailed by 130.

Cook and Pieterson, two of England’s strongest and most experienced batsmen gave away their wickets cheaply, by misguided shots – Cook feeling for the ball and gloving it, whilst Pieterson carelessly sent the ball high straight to deep backward square.  The middle to lower order batsmen followed quickly behind, with Bell and Prior victims of Ajmal’s doosra and teesra.  Trott was the only batsmen who looked close to his usual playing standards, but worrying signs of England’s lack of preparation and focus were demonstrated by a lazy swipe, causing Trott to edge the ball into the slips.  England’s second innings displayed a team lacking focus and concentration.  Players like Cook and Trott, famous for never giving their wicket away cheaply, displayed a remarkable lack of concentration.  England played less than 10 fours and no sixes in their innings, and chose to play defensively. 

Pakistan were brilliant with their bowling and at times unplayable.  However, the skill, experience and quality of the England batsmen are so great that you would not expect them to crumble so easily.  So why did they?  I believe it was a mixture of a lack of concentration and inadequate preparation.  None of the batsmen appeared comfortable at the crease and playing the Dubai conditions.  When you compare the performance to  that of the Ashes, England looked settled and happy to play in the Australian climate, whereas over the past three days England have looked like they have not adapted to playing in the UAE.  More warm up games, certainly were needed, to acclimatise to conditions and to bring the batsmen up to scratch.  My view is that the way to solve the batting is to put in more time in the nets between now and the next test match and to snap the boys back into focus.  Talent does not disappear and cannot be turned on or off, it just relies on 100% concentration, and no batsman brought that level of focus to the crease.  In theory, this is an easy problem to solve, and will be solved, the only question is, will it be in time for the next test?   

Also, I believe there was a problem with the team selected.  It is not often that you criticize Flower, but I do think he made a mistake in this match.  If you’re playing in drastically different conditions to home, why put out a team that is so used to playing on English pitches.  If the conditions change, as management, they needed to ensure that the team changed with the conditions.  It does not mean that particular players do not deserve their place; it just means that the combination of players must complement the environment of play.   Why was Tremlett there?  Why was Monty not playing?  Granted, it is unusual for England to play two spinners, but in the warm up matches Monty was so promising that he should have been playing and supporting Graham Swann.  Surely the warm up games indicated to the England management, that Monty was better suited to playing on UAE wickets that Tremlett, or even Swann for that matter.  On paper and in practice, at home and in Australia, Tremlett has been the better bowler, but in the experience of the UAE, Monty provided the damage. 

England must regroup, refocus and attack.  They are a side that does not deserve the label of losing by 10 wickets.  But, perhaps this defeat occurred at a critical time.  By England’s recent performance rumours of ‘complacency’ could be whispered.  With hindsight, you might be able to look back on this Test match saying “thank goodness Pakistan thumped them; it gave them the kick up the back-side needed to avoid long-term complacency”.  

Only time will tell if this theory is true – but let’s hope so! 

Statistics of Note: 

Pakistan 338-all out 

England 160-all out 

Gul 4-63

Ajmal 3-42 (10 wickets in match)  

Akmal 61 

Trott 49 

PAKISTAN v ENGLAND, 1st Test, Day 2 - The England fight back begins

The England dressing room were all too aware that they have not made this easy for themselves.  On the second day in Dubai, Pakistan were confident, taking to the crease with an intact batting line up.  It was a day like today where England had to show how and why they are world number one.

Play began with two wickets being taken in the morning session.  Hafeez fell to LBW by Swann, having contributed a very useful 88 runs & Stuart Broad led the fight back, by taking the wicket of the second top order batsman, Umar.  Broad delivered with venom to bowl Umar out for 58 - one of the key wickets of the day.  Broady may look baby-faced but when England needs someone to push that little bit harder & dig that little bit deeper, Broad is usually the man for the job.  His second wicket came in the form of, Azhar Ali and Pakistan's number 3 was another important batsman to remove from the crease. 

Strauss' captaincy is also worth a mention.  He showed good vision by bringing on Johnathon Trott to bowl from the Emirates Road end, and Trotty took Pakistan's number 4 by LBW, a brilliant confidence booster for the part-timer.  Trott also has reason to be disappointed; Strauss had removed the slip cordon which, if in place, would have provided his second wicket of the day.  Anderson opened his account in the session before tea, gaining his first wicket from a wonderful Prior catch, after Shafiq came feeling for the ball, guiding it low to the right-hand side of the keeper. 

The real England fight back came in the evening session.  Throughout the day the English bowlers were able to keep Pakistan's lead low.  Strauss' use of Tremlett & Trott to bowl the remaining overs before the new ball was an inspired move, it reduced Pakistan's run-rate to just over two, but the most significant breakthrough came from Anderson & Swann striking late.  Together, the off field partners in crime, took the fight to Pakistan - all guns blazing.  In the penultimate over of the day Swann sent a ball down the off-side to Misbah-ul-Haq, which turned and hit the pad.  Umpire Billy Bowden gave 'not out' & from initial viewing the ball appeared to be just missing leg-stump.  England reviewed, and low and behold the ball was hitting the top of the stumps - Swann had his second wicket & highlighted the importance of the DRS review system in the modern game.  Anderson was handed the ball for the final over of the day, and struck with the very last ball - hitting Rehman's off-stump.       

England played with determination, keeping Pakistan grounded.  Still Tremlett did not look aggressive enough & with 0-48 he is looking like a wasteful bowler, which in England's position, they cannot afford.  At the end of play Pakistan lead by 96 with 3 wickets remaining, suggesting that today the tide turned more in England's favour.  Tomorrow, Stauss must look to his bowlers for fast wickets & be prepared to once again face Ajmal.  

Statistics of Note, Day 2: 

Pakistan 288-7 (104.3 overs) lead by 96  

Trott 1-16

Anderson 2-57

Broad 2-72

Swann 2-89 

Hafeez 88 

Umar 58

Misbah-ul-Haq 52